Yesterday I was reading a newspaper article which stated that the global economy is slowly recovering. Regional divisions: Asia leads the continent with the highest rates of growth, followed by Africa and Latin America and finally the more developed countries. In the past one could divide between Eastern Europe (led by Germany and France) and then the rest of Europe and the U.S..
This is a good sign as that posed by the rise of emerging economies, our so precious agricultural and manufacturing products from Asian countries. But it is also necessary that the major economies recover to continue consuming our products and thus must increase its exports as well. A great economic balance ...
arrive in good time this recovery, but this is a new growth sustainable?
My biggest concern with this euphoria of recovery recognized by the World Bank and IMF, is that we forget what brought us to the debacle and that therefore we will enjoy that growth is not sustainable.
There have been changes and now poses a more regulatory role of the state, the restructuring of international organizations and increased awareness of economic realities de cada país. Pero me pregunto:
¿Qué porcentaje de los grandes planes de salvataje se asignaron a la inversión en energías renovables?
No sé exactamente, pero si no fue lo suficiente hemos desaprovechado una oportunidad histórica de construir una economía y un mundo más sustentable.
Dicen que el estudio de la historia es nuestra manera de llevar adelante una conciencia colectiva que nos impida cometer los mismos errores.
Espero que podamos ejercer una profunda memoria de la historia para construir un crecimiento sustentable que permita la erradicación de la pobreza de una vez por todas.
0 comments:
Post a Comment